Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Session Scoop Saves Orphans

On May 10 and 19, the Session Scoop team helped bring numerous orphans to Annapolis for pictures with Governor Martin O’Malley.  It was part of a yearly ritual that marks, in many ways, the end of the 2011 legislative session.  It is rewarding, hectic, confusing at times, and not at all what you think.

On these two days, Governor O’Malley, Lt. Governor Brown, Senate President Mike Miller and House Speaker Mike Busch signed into law almost 500 enactments of the Assembly, ending the journey of each from idea, to bill, to law.  

Supporters of the approved legislation attend the signing ceremony, receiving a pen and a photograph to commemorate its passage.  (See MAIF’s photo!)  Sometimes, there are no public victors available to celebrate a legislative success, and sadly, the bill becomes an “orphan”.

Bill signing day is a marvel of government efficiency.  Yes, really.  Over 200 bills are signed in a formal ceremony that usually involves the sponsor and citizens who worked to secure its passage.  For some signings, the crowd is large.  For instance, the so-called Dream Act, which allows undocumented Marylanders to receive in-state tuition rates at the state’s community colleges, involved dozens of activists.  The bill was “signed” four times to accommodate the over 100 supporters that wanted to be a part of the picture.

Bill signing ceremonies are highly choreographed.  The day before the event, a list of legislation to be signed is posted by the Governor’s office.  The next day, those supporters interested in the photo op assemble on the first floor of the State House while the elected officials are corralled in the Governor’s ceremonial office on the second floor. 

How can we know all of this inside information?  It just so happens that the Session Scoop team was in the trenches.  Armed with a list of bills, the team helped direct each elected official into the correct photo.  This is way harder than it sounds.  First, you have to recognize the official (they hate not being recognized).  Second, you have to determine which bill the official wants to be photographed in.  This is a big challenge.

Why?  Three reasons.  First, the intel is lacking.  The powers that be provide a list of bill numbers, in the order they will be signed.  However, if a bill was cross-filed (introduced in the House and Senate) and both bills passed, they are signed simultaneously.  This means that when someone comes for the photo of a House bill, you have to figure out the Senate bill number so they can get in the right picture.  But it gets far more confusing.

Another problem that plagues this process can only be described as the brain drain that follows the end of session. Many of the officials have forgotten (or possibly never knew) the bill numbers of legislation they worked on over the past six months.  One official told Session Scoop he was there for the “phosphates” bill, but didn’t know the bill number.  In fact, there wasn’t even a bill throughout the entire 2011 session with the word “phosphates” in the title.  Pretty frustrating, right? 

And still, chaos continues its manic reign right through the minutes leading up to the big photo.  Bill signings start at 10:00 a.m.  Between 9:50 a.m. - 10:05 a.m. hoards of politicians sashay into the room prepping for their “close up”.  This creates a perfect storm of confusion:  lots of people looking for direction and only a few brave souls providing some.

Meanwhile, hundreds of people wait on the first floor, listening for their bill to be called.  A bill number is called out to the crowd; interested supporters surge forward and follow a red-jacketed youth volunteer up to the second floor.  As they enter the ceremonial office, they are coupled with the appropriate politician.  Eventually, supporters stand proudly behind the signers, for the official photo.  This process is repeated hundreds of times each day.

As each group entered, our team checked bill numbers and alerted the appropriate elected officials.  During this time, many of the elected officials grow impatient waiting for their bill to be called.  Many don’t understand why their bills can’t be called by sponsor, instead of by bill number, and everyone wants to know why it can’t all happen NOW!  There is something funny and chaotic about dozens of adults all trying to go first, and charging that the system is unfair.

Not surprisingly, some of them learn how to “cheat.”  They have their staff go downstairs and get their bills called out all in a row.  This makes the Master bill list upstairs instantly outdated – leading to more confusion, or as the Session Scoop team thinks if it – “fun”.  Fun because in the confusion, the politicians looked to our team for help.  (This role reversal is sweet, because for 90 days we had to beg them for help.)  Enjoying the power, we helped some, confused others, and asked for contributions (one of those clauses is false).

Somehow, despite the confusion, it all works.  The elected officials are happy with assistance we’ve provided, some even hang out and talk with us as they await their next photo.  We get a valuable opportunity to build relationships on behalf of MAIF.

But what about the orphans?

If a bill is called on the first floor and no public supporters gather behind the red-jacketed volunteer, it is scratched from the photo list and stopped before it reaches the second floor. This complicates things upstairs.  Even though there’s no interest on the first floor, an elected official might be waiting on the orphaned bill on the second floor.  What a mess.

To get the “orphan bills” and the elected officials together in a photo, the team must revisit the bill number guessing game with the elected official, “I don’t know the number, but it involves school busses….”  And so it continues.  Once the orphans are identified, they are reunited with the elected official who gets a prime, solo spot in the picture.

Somehow it all works.  Volunteering gave the Session Scoop team a headache, but built some wonderful connections with elected officials, their constituents, and family members.

Plus, we helped the orphans.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

MAIF Asks Drivers to Buckle Up For A Buck

MAIF's Charitable Giving Committee is asked dozens of times throughout the year to donate on behalf of causes that run the gamut from incurable diseases to projects that help sustain the environment.  One of our most favorite causes is vehicular safety.  It's not too surprising that an automobile insurance company would make safety a priority.  Besides the obvious reason of saving lives, vehicular safety can also increase your insurances rates. 

Buckle Up For A Buck is a brilliant idea from the Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA).  Partnering with SHA and the Montgomery County Police Department, MAIF funded the program in which law and enforcement and safety advocates handed out $1 bills to all drivers and passengers who buckled up before heading out on the road. The message was simple:  It pays to buckle up.  Literally.  Those drivers and passengers who neglected to wear their seat belts received a warning from law enforcement and information about the costs of not buckling up.

A buck won't change a life, or even buy much of a candy bar.  But this relatively inexpensive incentive always generates awareness of automobile safety issues and inspires stories about the importance of using a seatbelt.

 

Friday, April 29, 2011

BIG NEWS Next Week...

Session Scoop isn't ready to sign-off just yet, stay tuned next week for our video update filmed at historic Fort McHenry. 

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

A Carnival of Cross-Fire


It’s the time of year in Annapolis when you have to watch out for the cross-fire.  Many bills are filed in both the House and Senate – this is called cross-filing.  The advantage of cross-filing is that you are virtually assured a hearing in both chambers, allowing bill supporters to educate all the involved parties.  If identical bills end up passing the House and Senate, the bill is passed.

But sometimes identical versions don’t pass; sometimes a version is voted down in one chamber and passes the other, and sometimes votes in one chamber impact votes and other issues in the other chamber.  All this activity sets up the April cross-fire phenomenon.  Bills march back and forth across Rowe Boulevard, like items in a carnival shooting gallery, some survive, but some die for the dumbest of reasons.

Recently, we wrote about issues surrounding motor scooters.  See Motor Scooters – like a bike or like a motorcycle? While not exactly the same bills, House Bill 961 and Senate Bill 708 both required licensing, registering, and insuring of motor scooters.  Senate Bill 708 passed the full Senate intact - now it has to journey across the street to the House.

SB 708, is now assigned to the same Committee that considered the related House Bill, 961.  HB 961 died in Committee – technically it is set for a Summer Study, which is a more detailed post-session review of the issue.  Senate Bill 708, then, is doomed to Summer Study too.  It is a victim of cross-fire.

But it will not be the only victim.  The House passed legislation making using a cell phone while driving a primary violation instead of a secondary violation.  The Senate rejected the bill.  In retaliation, the House rejected other bills.  The Senate passed the Civil Marriage bill.  The House failed to enact it.  The House passed a bill providing protections to transgendered individuals – but now the Senate won’t consider it.  And so it goes.

A popular Senate bill now waits its turn to see if it will get caught in cross-fire.  Senate Bill 679 allows local jurisdictions to install cameras on school buses to catch motorists who fail to stop when the bus is loading or unloading children.  It passed the Senate 38 to 7.  But the House already rejected a similar bill – House Bill 1106.  More cross-fire?

At the end of the day, legislators are people too.  Like people everywhere, they retaliate for rejections – real or perceived.  It’s cross-fire season in Annapolis, and people are trying real hard not to let their bills get hit.





The .0015% Solution

The State’s operating budget is over 14 billion, with a “b”, dollars.  All of us see it as the State’s blueprint for spending, but few know it can be a lethal arena for what many of us might see as pure policy issues.

Last year, the Governor announced that he was moving the Department of Housing and Community Development from Crownsville (in Anne Arundel County) to rental space at a Metro stop in Prince George’s County.  The move fulfilled a 2006 campaign pledge.  You might think that the Governor – the Chief Executive Officer of the State – would be able to decide where executive offices are located.

You would be wrong.

Employees, the employees union, and Anne Arundel County fought the move through the budget process.  The Department of Housing and Community Development’s budget is part of that $14 billion spending plan.  Legislators burrowed deep into it, and inserted a $250,000 provision requiring a study and legislative approval on constructing or rehabilitating the Department’s headquarters in Crownsville, and a detailed review of a move to Prince George’s County impact of the existing employees.  The $250,000, on a percentage basis, is .0015 of a percent of the state’s general operating budget.

Will the Department move?  Time will tell, but that .0015 % solution just might prove lethal to this initative.


Monday, April 4, 2011

And the survey says...

A big THANK YOU to all of our readers that took the Punt, Pass, or Kick Survey last week.  It was great to hear from all of you on the legislation that we've talked about over the past (almost) 90 days.

So, we thought it best to "share with the class" and give you the results of the first ever MAIF's Policy and Communication's Department Punt, Pass or Kick Survey, here it goes:

We asked...
On February 14th we discussed SB 48. Remember SB 48? It requires that a record be kept by those installing replacement airbags in vehicles and that the buyer is made aware of the salvaged airbag prior to purchase. What do you think the outcome of SB 48 will be?

You responded...
Punt:  19%
Pass:  74%
Kick:  7%

Our take....
The bill had an air of public safety and anti-fraud efforts about it.  The issue is complicated by Federal law issues and it's getting too late to figure things out down here.  We vote kick.

We asked...
On February 11th we wrote about SB 138. If passed, SB 138 would allow Marylanders to prove damages by submitting unpaid estimates, instead of a paid bill. What do you think will happen to SB 138?

You responded...
Punt:  23%
Pass:  19%
Kick:  58%

Our take....
We predict a heavily amended bill, restricting it to estimates prepared by or on behalf of an insurance company, will...pass.

We asked...Financial literacy is an important topic, but is it important enough to mandate that it be taught as a graduation requirment as SB 262 details? On February 25th we discussed the pros and cons of financial literacy in the classroom. What is your bet on the outcome of SB 262?

You responded...
Punt:  45%
Pass:  22%
Kick:  33%

Our take....There is a concern about micro managing the classroom.  This is viewed as a good idea, but might be a bad law.  We vote kick.

We asked...On February 23rd we wrote about HB 222. Remember the camel's nose and HB 222? Sponsors of the bill want to make using a handheld cell phone a primary offense in Maryland. Do you think the camel is completely in the tent?

You responded...
Punt:  26%
Pass:  55%
Kick:  19%

Our take....It turns out we cheated on this one.  The bill passed the full House and died in a Senate committee.  A definitive kick.

We asked...We discussed HB 1058 and its companion, SB 711 on March 7th. If passed the legislation would shift the insurance responsibility from the rental company to your personal automobile policy in Maryland. Which direction do you think these bills are heading?

You responded...

Punt:  32%
Pass:  16%
Kick:  52%

Our take....The bill was doomed when the owner of a rental car company lectured the Senate committee that was hearing the bill.  Disrespect never plays well.  We vote kick.

We asked...Session Scoop just updated you on March 18th about the unfavorable outcome of the HB 737, legislation that would prohibit smoking in a vehicle with a child under the age of eight. The companion bill however, SB 415 is still under consideration. What will be the outcome of SB 415?

You responded...

Punt:  19%
Pass:  23%
Kick:  58%

Our take:There are still some limits on how far government will go.  This is a kick.

We asked...On March 18th we wrote about HB 873. HB 873 – the Maryland Civil Litigation Funding Act would allow people to receive "funding" in advance of the outcome of their case, in return for paying back the company once the case has been settled or won. What will come of HB 873?

You responded...

Punt:  45%
Pass:  13%
Kick:  32%

Our takeThis bill makes a number of people very uncomfortable.  The industry is trying to offer amendments to save it, but we think it's too hard for people to swallow.  We vote...kick.